Services

Micro frontend development for products that outgrew a single UI.

One product shell, independently deployed frontends. Teams keep their own release cycle without freezing the rest of the application, and the customer still sees one coherent product.

What we build

We split a large frontend by business domain billing, catalog, admin, onboarding so each team can ship without waiting on a shared codebase. We only recommend this when team boundaries and release cadence actually need it, not as a default.

When this is the right move

A 200,000-line SPA becomes a queue: one team’s release blocks everyone else. Micro frontends fix that by aligning the UI with how the organization already works. If one team owns the whole interface, a well-structured SPA is simpler and cheaper. We will tell you which path fits.

The same senior architects who design the split also review the pull requests, so the composition stays maintainable three years later, not only on the whiteboard.

Technology stack

Module Federation single-spa Angular React TypeScript Webpack Vite Nx

Common questions

When should we use micro frontends instead of one SPA?
When independent teams need independent releases, or when extracting a domain from a monolith without a big-bang rewrite. If one team owns the whole UI, keep a single application with clear modules.
Can Angular and React live in the same product?
Yes, when you are extracting a domain or integrating an acquired product. We keep a shared shell, authentication, and design tokens so it still feels like one product to the user.
Will this slow the application down?
It can, if every screen loads three extra runtimes. We design the shell, shared libraries, and loading strategy so users do not pay for teams they are not using.

Need to split a large frontend?

Tell us how the teams ship today. A senior architect replies within one business day.

Start a conversation →

Other services